{"id":"W1931911060","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02402.x","title":"The effect of elevated CO2 on growth and competition in experimental phytoplankton communities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Change Biology","topic":"Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phytoplankton; Competition (biology); Biology; Interspecific competition; Relative species abundance; Ecology; Pairwise comparison; Taxon; Cyanobacteria; Abundance (ecology); Growth rate; Nutrient; Statistics; Mathematics; Bacteria","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007367918,0.0006410913,0.0007087502,0.0003018386,0.001010626,0.0005878261,0.001014236,0.0006668488,0.0007300708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001960444,0.0004148831,0.0004016133,0.0003522435,0.001209889,0.0005984223,0.001388806,0.001310611,0.0001578593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001057898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008047359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005279658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008795851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985441,0.0005080817,0.0001259608,0.0003730822,0.0002970417,0.0001518728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961632,0.001728726,0.0006207475,0.0005298522,0.0003836716,0.0005737746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002771118,0.0007264582,0.008955872,0.0001268328,0.00007628657,0.0001660006,0.0002592085,0.001054281,0.9832585,0.0001319185,0.00005350835,0.002419985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007843824,0.0225995,0.127594,0.00003307009,0.0003011136,0.0004776136,0.0007456473,0.01523867,0.8284276,0.0009673713,0.002628807,0.0002022735],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986565,0.0000800761,0.0007319475,0.00003663408,0.00001465882,0.00005356225,0.00008955201,0.00001405934,0.0003229262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994405,0.00009704416,0.004476215,0.0001385731,0.00002410774,0.0002027855,0.0002083691,0.00001872679,0.0004292068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005279658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01049787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03596515988203414,"score_gpt":0.2533394182101869,"score_spread":0.2173742583281527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}