{"id":"W1931911060","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02402.x","title":"The effect of elevated CO2 on growth and competition in experimental phytoplankton communities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Change Biology","topic":"Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phytoplankton; Competition (biology); Biology; Interspecific competition; Relative species abundance; Ecology; Pairwise comparison; Taxon; Cyanobacteria; Abundance (ecology); Growth rate; Nutrient; Statistics; Mathematics; Bacteria","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001514739,0.00006227719,0.00009212109,0.00002383144,0.00007117943,0.00000502896,0.00008231101,0.00004353018,0.00008796002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001582639,0.00003448588,0.0000129037,0.00006314967,0.0002139696,0.00002520376,0.000007718972,0.00003884241,0.00001603069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002475398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003302853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004138346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005137319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993936,0.0003321419,0.0000745307,0.0000624093,0.00003250153,0.0001047531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996435,0.0002223385,0.00003779989,0.00006847715,0.000006037885,0.00002184886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007590966,0.00001180723,0.992434,0.000009471162,0.000005825023,0.000001640342,0.000377266,7.889672e-8,0.0002294003,0.003084934,0.000007665049,0.003078812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003653134,0.00260287,0.9867174,0.00001575809,0.000002550738,0.000009411749,0.0004168742,0.00005477026,0.009270541,0.0002965773,0.0001920097,0.00005593375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953271,0.001165948,4.436445e-7,0.00004498158,0.0001373096,0.0001502079,0.00006443006,0.000009510688,0.003100031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996603,0.000168431,0.000004157464,0.00007543177,0.00002004609,0.000002692502,0.00006587637,6.590637e-7,0.000002464815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009041142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6255969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03596515988203414,"score_gpt":0.2533394182101869,"score_spread":0.2173742583281527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}