{"id":"W1934575984","doi":"10.1002/jclp.21933","title":"Preliminary Evaluation of an Observational Measure of Group Cohesion for Group Psychotherapy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Psychology; Observational study; Inter-rater reliability; Clinical psychology; Group psychotherapy; Cohesion (chemistry); Construct validity; Group cohesiveness; Internal consistency; Test validity; Psychometrics; Psychotherapist; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Rating scale","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02056571,0.0003217389,0.0004140743,0.001496066,0.000849688,0.0009440657,0.0009798957,0.0005891279,0.002736041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06848269,0.0002411247,0.0006326619,0.0008790218,0.0006305811,0.0009937288,0.001398757,0.0007975207,0.0003088306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009359742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001719371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001364311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004605878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861419,0.009075255,0.001063926,0.0004835061,0.002914279,0.0003212074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9457136,0.03339373,0.006105991,0.00316571,0.009543277,0.002077722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001545452,0.002955956,0.612879,0.0008471941,0.0002606001,0.0001179035,0.01035354,0.001300708,0.005535342,0.001380191,0.003424572,0.3593995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005262282,0.005529456,0.9684576,0.0002805597,0.000185843,0.0002149514,0.003865058,0.008404649,0.002927492,0.001239097,0.008287136,0.00008201433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9304478,0.0003911186,0.04564813,0.0004235361,0.0002318764,0.01054078,0.001099255,0.0002863937,0.01093109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9169757,0.0002057143,0.07240153,0.00009008876,0.00008374835,0.008394726,0.0008480948,0.0000318985,0.0009685141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02056571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1087632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5731091411745647,"score_gpt":0.6102892470835688,"score_spread":0.03718010590900411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}