{"id":"W1934575984","doi":"10.1002/jclp.21933","title":"Preliminary Evaluation of an Observational Measure of Group Cohesion for Group Psychotherapy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Psychology; Observational study; Inter-rater reliability; Clinical psychology; Group psychotherapy; Cohesion (chemistry); Construct validity; Group cohesiveness; Internal consistency; Test validity; Psychometrics; Psychotherapist; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Rating scale","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01261789,0.0001837793,0.0007599971,0.000210277,0.00004516565,0.000004202189,0.0005286875,0.000511457,0.0007934695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001975975,0.0001548534,0.0005332216,0.0002557842,0.0002362083,0.0002585697,0.000006640918,0.0003981928,0.000005271738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001949719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000668689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004452912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003309531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951105,0.001061697,0.002635421,0.0002914824,0.0006048735,0.0002960252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944232,0.0009736038,0.002735908,0.000650436,0.001015421,0.000201441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02029276,0.02102302,0.09063334,0.00005134239,0.0009080641,0.000001103826,0.00118384,0.00001268325,0.02684952,0.06554335,0.06225441,0.7112466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008945109,0.00916722,0.8789864,0.00007994221,0.0002673557,0.00007942422,0.00009088253,0.0001120588,0.0002051977,0.05802159,0.04384274,0.0002021399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8931701,0.002452492,0.09526123,0.001734695,0.00325804,0.001072164,0.00004525276,0.00002392725,0.00298208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562003,0.0003724057,0.04029812,0.001431408,0.001456471,0.0001227195,0.00002744741,0.00004505198,0.00004609622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.788353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8687935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5731091411745647,"score_gpt":0.6102892470835688,"score_spread":0.03718010590900411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}