{"id":"W193571843","doi":"","title":"International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an International Theory of International Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Constructivism (international relations); Political science; International relations theory; Law; International relations; Legitimacy; Empirical legal studies; Epistemology; Legal positivism; Philosophy of law; Rationality; Sociology; Legal profession; Comparative law; Politics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01004166,0.0008043668,0.0008820894,0.005859891,0.004805288,0.01706809,0.002154351,0.004381786,0.004989021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00943232,0.0005354027,0.0009558927,0.005204014,0.07356635,0.02234201,0.007805553,0.00853976,0.000581892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006104982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004778453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002420012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001795447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927393,0.004671083,0.0002336991,0.0005411961,0.00133225,0.0004825724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899012,0.007204503,0.0006473688,0.00117754,0.0005547476,0.0005145934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001017517,0.0000039156,0.00005393878,0.000006888037,0.000001134856,0.00000724324,0.001431125,0.00008057575,0.000007964146,0.9973815,0.0001756861,0.0008489679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003061631,0.000003954189,0.00007256741,0.00004157166,0.000001582609,0.00001960472,0.0009239899,0.0003641903,0.00001631303,0.9893058,0.009244483,0.000002891319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01964692,0.00703234,0.2431998,0.06785203,0.000566631,0.0001361823,0.00009653745,0.0001805601,0.6612889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265981,0.004423297,0.05369653,0.003566075,0.0008036243,0.000505809,0.0001255432,0.0001639718,0.01011722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01706809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05310607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007808981244521177,"score_gpt":0.2348013824846374,"score_spread":0.2269924012401162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}