{"id":"W1937113854","doi":"","title":"Evaluating Institutional Arrangements to Support Watershed-scale Cumulative Effects Assessment in the Grand River Watershed, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watershed; Scale (ratio); Grand Challenges; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Geography; Water resource management; Computer science; Cartography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0187605,0.0005260226,0.0005903994,0.002498139,0.005734453,0.007084317,0.004038678,0.001472859,0.00335812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06051413,0.0006237666,0.0004751368,0.003438197,0.002892395,0.002453181,0.003739827,0.001306909,0.0003046952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1054535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1920781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9432912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9747669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870771,0.00477515,0.0005764857,0.0006013524,0.003663673,0.003306286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9354564,0.02486534,0.004315855,0.003868178,0.02316427,0.008329961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004094847,0.006546254,0.418386,0.0004421854,0.0005590989,0.001064561,0.006213816,0.3023616,0.006256945,0.0320035,0.01028495,0.2117863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002633686,0.004590301,0.5582902,0.0005384255,0.0009557934,0.000140574,0.06262632,0.321216,0.01026563,0.00875949,0.02958227,0.0004013392],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769254,0.0001443272,0.003168445,0.001114691,0.00001845949,0.002058392,0.0005210514,0.0001241901,0.015925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882973,0.0001229326,0.008506035,0.0001025957,0.000005987363,0.0005434919,0.0003822725,0.00001595005,0.002023433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1054535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.765122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01821336458154935,"score_gpt":0.2158438680465208,"score_spread":0.1976305034649714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}