{"id":"W1937457939","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2578","title":"Reasoning Under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific Inquiry","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Epistemology; Heuristics; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Argumentation theory; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007831476,0.0001569694,0.0002164114,0.0001699773,0.0005459771,0.000254209,0.0003563881,0.00006678118,0.0004139063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000544166,0.0001071739,0.0000886253,0.0001175181,0.001440916,0.001152507,0.000110233,0.0003496868,0.00006390837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001967915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004062094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004077514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004240863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986749,0.00006148576,0.0004568861,0.0001396775,0.0002669956,0.0004001047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991714,0.0001016593,0.0001983033,0.0003101172,0.0001683139,0.00005023543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001366515,0.00004381862,0.002162778,0.00002525017,0.00001565988,0.000001392942,0.2151704,0.005217555,0.0000615984,0.7705274,0.00007626033,0.00668423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001807294,0.0006285578,0.004875395,0.0001849525,0.00007734901,0.00002261679,0.4551597,0.05460864,0.000635619,0.08247312,0.3985276,0.0009991003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8610489,0.0004494691,0.00002001585,0.0001613811,0.0007522178,0.0001379332,0.000008708059,0.00005078811,0.1373705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971451,0.00001967503,0.00005564613,0.0006015926,0.0002836147,0.00001143189,0.00001926326,0.000008500559,0.001855243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6880543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5309116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1210082794878075,"score_gpt":0.3074374393949335,"score_spread":0.186429159907126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}