{"id":"W1940067796","doi":"","title":"A comparison of 2008 National Classification System for Contaminated Sites scores to preliminary quantitative risk assessment hazard quotients","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hazard; Risk assessment; Quotient; Protocol (science); Hazard quotient; Statistics; Environmental health; Mathematics; Computer science; Medicine; Ecology; Biology; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007655565,0.0003518384,0.0003680371,0.002777029,0.0003123521,0.000862024,0.0006562833,0.0003331187,0.001553237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02631387,0.0001611713,0.0003790428,0.002528271,0.0005135899,0.0006631719,0.001052696,0.0004868731,0.0004656474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00168558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001624489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0181608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02147003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949841,0.001418632,0.0005141757,0.0003234496,0.002597336,0.0001621649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772874,0.006375029,0.003048162,0.001764967,0.0111455,0.0003789235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001133147,0.0003567672,0.840386,0.0001555528,0.0002026513,0.00007503457,0.0009584505,0.01235354,0.00640718,0.003438867,0.00792638,0.1266065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006901956,0.001274577,0.9671934,0.00004146364,0.00005909899,0.0002056693,0.001345197,0.01466824,0.006061106,0.001570765,0.007443727,0.00006768395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9469453,0.00009435933,0.02646172,0.0002224013,0.00005209358,0.0004205585,0.004867574,0.0002317438,0.02070428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758364,0.00004995695,0.0175853,0.00005007247,0.000007550403,0.0003071169,0.00457312,0.00003162413,0.001558829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0181608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04048693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0491593159255666,"score_gpt":0.2752192581947018,"score_spread":0.2260599422691352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}