{"id":"W1943192450","doi":"10.1675/1524-4695-31.sp2.110","title":"Abundance and Distribution of Harlequin Ducks in the Hudson and James Bay Area, Québec","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waterbirds","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de la Gaspésie; Parks Canada; Hydro-Québec; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Bay; Tundra; Geography; Fishery; Abundance (ecology); Aerial survey; Waterfowl; Whale; Tributary; Ecology; Biology; Arctic; Habitat; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108064,0.0000446814,0.00006622772,0.000005558169,0.0001406835,0.000003192195,0.00005926536,0.0000282441,0.00005146629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001291528,0.00002792578,0.000008694545,0.00003906474,0.0004700257,0.00006519313,0.00009241346,0.00003628434,0.0000116533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002302552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002556481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001869085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01529599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996755,0.00002453723,0.00005733918,0.00009826412,0.0000567322,0.00008769057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999885,0.0000285221,0.0000195043,0.00005308548,0.000002042602,0.00001179453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000929367,0.00002079649,0.9938382,0.000003122464,0.000002367555,0.000006160793,0.002954405,0.000001965748,0.000386428,0.000002633776,0.002428465,0.000346157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001315905,0.00005610742,0.9950981,0.00000347931,0.000003790481,0.00001158507,0.0004107765,0.000003900482,0.0008721184,0.00004698471,0.003324266,0.00003732319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976336,0.0001603101,0.000005748122,0.001627103,0.00001545737,0.00005153047,0.000008942402,0.000004582699,0.0004927174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994615,0.0001968454,0.00002118291,0.0001089943,0.000004002944,0.000001956086,0.000002719476,7.883472e-7,0.0002019951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01342691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8535523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01181730220362008,"score_gpt":0.182962562722105,"score_spread":0.171145260518485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}