{"id":"W1944920263","doi":"10.1002/fut.20540","title":"Time‐varying jump risk premia in stock index futures returns","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Futures Markets","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Economics; Jump; Futures contract; Econometrics; Volatility (finance); Stock index futures; Index (typography); Autoregressive model; Stock market index; Stock (firearms); Futures market; Risk premium; Financial economics; Stock market; Computer science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002051052,0.0003579812,0.0004027063,0.0009540074,0.0002038306,0.001449987,0.0003460863,0.0007270621,0.002342698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01850713,0.0002240931,0.0005312713,0.0005755912,0.000572632,0.001383422,0.0007351047,0.0009474226,0.0002027556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003638215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002268231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001075702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007522617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993777,0.0001273747,0.00007145949,0.0001275455,0.0001883136,0.0001075945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810566,0.01069832,0.005739931,0.0009798741,0.0007265151,0.0007987286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00152498,0.0004181504,0.9325266,0.00007780152,0.0004018183,0.0008916217,0.0002795567,0.01939293,0.02323548,0.005191683,0.0002948346,0.01576447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003806469,0.0004609953,0.9085808,0.0000128521,0.0001660932,0.0004118816,0.0001628263,0.07937844,0.006460356,0.004034306,0.0002405075,0.00005284916],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981549,0.00004459956,0.001158296,0.00004851885,0.000006294902,0.000004168082,0.00006711322,0.00001810956,0.000497933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996717,0.00001778215,0.0001228403,0.000003884118,0.00001071577,0.000001130066,0.0000763839,0.000001890017,0.00009362965],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002342698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01084715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02871888563683917,"score_gpt":0.2173394660243233,"score_spread":0.1886205803874841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}