{"id":"W1947133599","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02484.x","title":"The role of maternal factors in sibling relationship quality: a multilevel study of multiple dyads per family","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","topic":"Cognitive Abilities and Testing","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Medical Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Sibling; Affection; Psychology; Hostility; Developmental psychology; Sibling relationship; Multilevel model; Malaise; Population; Social psychology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001339325,0.0001706379,0.0004163651,0.0003136001,0.0001468106,0.00000900695,0.0002766532,0.000161694,0.0001086233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002310847,0.0001206478,0.0001369384,0.0001822832,0.0001996527,0.00009934579,0.00003646182,0.0006668368,0.000002147256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007012239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003645562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003756789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002937812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975121,0.0005760269,0.001268745,0.0002145041,0.0001830648,0.0002455641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974125,0.001057007,0.001006984,0.0002850853,0.0001673436,0.00007107279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009895731,0.001306562,0.9719883,0.00001418825,0.0001781471,0.000002843469,0.01847999,0.000001370175,0.00007822673,0.002090008,0.00004415528,0.004826666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002888456,0.0009024466,0.9466563,0.00008830242,0.00005101935,0.00006936713,0.03976745,0.000003306686,0.0000171402,0.009307058,0.0001445082,0.0001046255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869649,0.002905176,0.0000496227,0.0002215464,0.001444562,0.0002160404,0.00001189013,0.000005903802,0.008180344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992759,0.00004579458,0.0003505968,0.0001455485,0.0001269037,0.0000051108,6.091171e-7,0.00001720138,0.00003236566],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02533195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4919874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08538574652408798,"score_gpt":0.3610075483065782,"score_spread":0.2756218017824902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}