{"id":"W194771532","doi":"10.14796/jwmm.r220-19","title":"Water Resources Modeling Tools - Open Source Code versus Proprietary Software","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Management Modeling","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Open source; Computer science; Source code; Software engineering; Software; Open water; Code (set theory); Water resources; Open source software; Water source; Systems engineering; Environmental science; Water resource management; Engineering; Operating system; Programming language; Marine engineering; Set (abstract data type)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005999747,0.0006062675,0.0004362691,0.003181112,0.0007543633,0.005205574,0.002515279,0.001601469,0.009597787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02794934,0.0006548489,0.001009879,0.005417236,0.001427062,0.01035989,0.003407922,0.001720586,0.003192468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001532324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00210071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002728936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004061238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962179,0.001015961,0.0003620886,0.0002983876,0.001892611,0.0002130475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847446,0.008472048,0.001224443,0.003058091,0.002111029,0.000389788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002301791,0.0004453105,0.012725,0.001163795,0.0001982933,0.0006134072,0.002591848,0.02539814,0.006506115,0.3497023,0.0881229,0.5123028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000127908,0.0001511773,0.01506673,0.001931647,0.0001925756,0.001229959,0.002438237,0.1824989,0.01219475,0.3775532,0.4063991,0.0002158129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05231351,0.003140433,0.7677932,0.01220957,0.0004896723,0.0002273625,0.002766424,0.02247995,0.13858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3630364,0.007545403,0.5837499,0.001648465,0.0003948,0.0005250984,0.005187002,0.01079556,0.02711734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03210777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04010205109975685,"score_gpt":0.2472536708570522,"score_spread":0.2071516197572953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}