{"id":"W1948403667","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00421.x","title":"Effect of ecological uncertainty on species at risk decision-making: COSEWIC expert opinion as a case study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Risk assessment; Expert elicitation; Ecology; Wildlife; Econometrics; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006328912,0.0001264542,0.0001533843,0.00003190899,0.0002075861,0.00002224422,0.0001220921,0.00005900723,0.001200186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003602405,0.00008895805,0.0000533754,0.0001357085,0.00009422227,0.00008663472,0.0001665847,0.0001239383,0.0002044708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007468274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004125553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001377164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001998658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99893,0.0001628231,0.0002043804,0.000276621,0.0002859511,0.0001402548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988931,0.0007201321,0.0001231727,0.0002102211,0.000009229175,0.00004415229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008153819,0.0003696218,0.9732534,0.000004569401,0.00001580555,0.000197913,0.0004742176,0.0001980272,0.003362569,0.0000768238,0.005454715,0.01577699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001013387,0.00594877,0.9769019,0.00001905168,0.00001884892,0.00006354914,0.000441563,0.001947506,0.0005346252,0.0001240048,0.01282092,0.0001658978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969781,0.000005453415,0.00001634953,0.0001698213,0.0001844665,0.0005494904,0.000004283783,0.0000273915,0.002064638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993983,0.00001333956,0.0001027922,0.000320534,0.00004900988,0.00003369372,0.000003740967,0.000006499327,0.00007212884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01561109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01602347618495663,"score_gpt":0.2987272564322755,"score_spread":0.2827037802473188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}