{"id":"W1948403667","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00421.x","title":"Effect of ecological uncertainty on species at risk decision-making: COSEWIC expert opinion as a case study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Risk assessment; Expert elicitation; Ecology; Wildlife; Econometrics; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05899424,0.000552396,0.0006629049,0.001655799,0.002574601,0.002661554,0.001491318,0.002503056,0.001637202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1404274,0.0004368486,0.001208529,0.001735952,0.002236906,0.001815699,0.002591038,0.001747585,0.0001219455],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006841604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003442685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02127125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03306611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9357966,0.05164401,0.002198589,0.001995123,0.00682451,0.001541214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5552885,0.409934,0.01192591,0.006864944,0.01427225,0.001714362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00622539,0.004076172,0.4164043,0.001358215,0.001463766,0.006288899,0.06035792,0.264859,0.007330616,0.0236555,0.005061156,0.2029192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001750564,0.008660936,0.2677764,0.001021362,0.001314221,0.003053733,0.09049346,0.5468011,0.0219039,0.02744113,0.02869431,0.001088973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890803,0.000125083,0.005972877,0.0005169915,0.00001257954,0.0002305785,0.0000808097,0.0000112337,0.003969646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903549,0.00008790984,0.008950412,0.0001314629,0.00001247384,0.0001598139,0.00006337895,0.000005276376,0.000234274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3119951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01602347618495663,"score_gpt":0.2987272564322755,"score_spread":0.2827037802473188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}