{"id":"W1948574184","doi":"","title":"Trading the Shield of Sovereignty for the Scales of Justice: A Proposal for Reform of International Sea Piracy Laws","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Maritime Security and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; International waters; State (computer science); Relevance (law); United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Universal jurisdiction; Territorial waters; International law; Law of the sea; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Public international law; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01694177,0.0007517468,0.001049039,0.001596057,0.00660788,0.01180378,0.00330115,0.01761697,0.006055188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02665376,0.0007616204,0.001956872,0.0009793754,0.03888784,0.0161149,0.009208957,0.01672403,0.001245844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007459573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01557627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007526571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007028412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918531,0.003291662,0.0003992704,0.001372595,0.001592056,0.001491283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992004,0.003241478,0.0007298067,0.001642339,0.001453549,0.0009287655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005606087,0.00001794475,0.00004593636,0.000007200225,0.000001939242,0.00002712345,0.0004597394,0.0002599488,0.00005389504,0.9969929,0.001238692,0.0008890321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007031663,0.00004233695,0.0002205373,0.00009725717,0.00001631016,0.0000487187,0.0005128967,0.00191009,0.0001623101,0.9547107,0.042175,0.0000335712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05247407,0.002265599,0.1166686,0.2881285,0.002867425,0.0007978439,0.0001167117,0.0002925086,0.5363886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8557662,0.0008706499,0.04844916,0.04110716,0.002269776,0.001330405,0.00004355329,0.000128022,0.05003501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01761697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0895977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0164566303780424,"score_gpt":0.3032176951666621,"score_spread":0.2867610647886197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}