{"id":"W1948599384","doi":"10.1109/tit.2015.2503766","title":"A Model for Adversarial Wiretap Channels","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Information Theory","topic":"Wireless Communication Security Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures","keywords":"Secrecy; Computer science; Eavesdropping; Code word; Code (set theory); Channel (broadcasting); Reliability (semiconductor); Theoretical computer science; Adversarial system; Algorithm; Computer network; Artificial intelligence; Decoding methods; Power (physics); Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002406383,0.001610091,0.001138666,0.001318643,0.001285061,0.00338898,0.003223382,0.003824981,0.0117246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009867679,0.0007241854,0.00131907,0.001504206,0.003825917,0.007587532,0.003703248,0.00528583,0.002860744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002118623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001474748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002730235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001499309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996029,0.001366336,0.0001927055,0.0007246039,0.001040272,0.0006471611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990369,0.005355091,0.00111339,0.001543386,0.001032164,0.0005868228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009644502,0.00004235331,0.0002055058,0.00006684299,0.00002328021,0.0002677312,0.000210594,0.08212224,0.001187165,0.9074328,0.004182863,0.004162118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005148029,0.00008113598,0.00009082415,0.00003339529,0.00002267708,0.0002221345,0.00006993151,0.5264471,0.0006999764,0.4629989,0.009246247,0.0000362051],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02179428,0.0003797434,0.943897,0.002193222,0.0001755801,0.0001552164,0.0008414943,0.0005381941,0.03002521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8386235,0.001828979,0.09326006,0.001144697,0.0006280906,0.0009646928,0.001264511,0.0003741498,0.06191124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03922266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03398889484881486,"score_gpt":0.2506278560638254,"score_spread":0.2166389612150105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}