{"id":"W1948860882","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2014-0077","title":"Comparative analysis of sewer physical condition grading protocols for the City of Edmonton","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Water Systems and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Natural Resources; University of Alberta","funders":"Drainage Services Department","keywords":"Sanitary sewer; Grading (engineering); Asset management; Protocol (science); Mains electricity; Certification; Computer science; Engineering; Transport engineering; Civil engineering; Environmental engineering; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002353753,0.00008522735,0.0003641259,0.0003071649,0.00002721098,0.00001716437,0.000113254,0.00003198353,0.00001151101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003986503,0.00006747753,0.0001542955,0.0002998039,0.00001772966,0.000109934,0.000002192267,0.00008257726,9.851236e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006079847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003685106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002083886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03042212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994175,0.00001174631,0.0003060009,0.00004379921,0.00009210033,0.0001288561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993968,0.0001088271,0.0001279289,0.00009471781,0.0001668849,0.0001048182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002449246,0.000002984482,0.0006280894,0.00008197631,0.000395807,3.282557e-7,0.0009374737,0.9959807,0.001185348,0.0004506038,0.0002958465,0.00003842369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002240141,0.00005949638,0.01001069,0.0001355622,0.0002478519,0.000002429582,0.00005178589,0.9821203,0.004998343,0.00003096674,0.002036909,0.00008158567],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1379074,0.0001166254,0.859366,0.0000246248,0.0002866815,0.001449324,0.00004620671,0.00001412844,0.0007889637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999523,7.380605e-7,0.0002493663,0.000001948016,0.0001263402,0.00007645306,0.000003919125,0.000009659345,0.00000858147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8616155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0167524972800329,"score_gpt":0.237593883075725,"score_spread":0.2208413857956922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}