{"id":"W1949656769","doi":"","title":"Common Ground, Argument Form and Analogical Reductio ad Absurdum","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Reductio ad absurdum; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Common ground; Inference; Philosophy; License; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007161643,0.0001713197,0.0003035761,0.0001617645,0.001341143,0.00006025219,0.000386845,0.00009720028,0.0008954719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002040274,0.000179754,0.0001234943,0.0000972763,0.0007035689,0.0005772248,0.0003790625,0.0003051697,0.00008566337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001142751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001768994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002639548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002871836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988408,0.00006945676,0.0002146009,0.0002643603,0.0003121926,0.0002985947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989995,0.0001220713,0.0001905059,0.0003887958,0.0001618725,0.000137244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002005416,0.001379684,0.2283297,0.000248337,0.001240206,0.0001295428,0.3052579,0.000003917249,0.002389062,0.379907,0.009325215,0.06978405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001327675,0.0002730556,0.4798981,0.00005821593,0.0001298401,0.0000200962,0.07716981,0.00000668862,0.0001415557,0.006351355,0.4341767,0.000446968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9427435,0.0008744078,0.00003989397,0.00111246,0.0002020844,0.0001413367,0.00001820446,0.00006332256,0.05480482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98487,0.0002779917,0.0002623239,0.0001194693,0.00009280526,3.715573e-7,0.00001932624,0.00001088053,0.01434683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4248514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04854313952085641,"score_gpt":0.2409642809586081,"score_spread":0.1924211414377517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}