{"id":"W1950405747","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.514","title":"Beyond Reasonable Doubt: An Abductive Dilemma in Criminal Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Acquittal; Dilemma; Reasonable doubt; Law; Adversarial system; Hearsay; Epistemology; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005119207,0.0001121297,0.0001514646,0.00005570272,0.0006502766,0.00006257673,0.0003124267,0.0001084835,0.0003625184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001118054,0.0001021809,0.00004159024,0.0002246053,0.0006045756,0.001577253,0.00005602586,0.0001845984,0.0001912774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008632802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001611601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03175853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03109296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987034,0.00006471106,0.0001979376,0.000172893,0.0003683499,0.0004927557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994473,0.00006852843,0.00006261987,0.0001575109,0.00009697807,0.0001670072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009482127,0.0000633659,0.002893259,0.00001051714,0.000002403367,0.0001220148,0.02092778,0.00008138374,0.00002711815,0.9733167,0.0003909305,0.002069693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001235477,0.001384643,0.06708941,0.0000950466,0.00005162261,0.0002557512,0.03496653,0.000173237,0.0006749688,0.09722239,0.7955839,0.001267029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6401737,0.00005517688,0.00002485423,0.0006703077,0.0001777499,0.0001346613,0.000003759131,0.00005970521,0.3587001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968315,0.00006589235,0.0006859117,0.001125763,0.0002412809,0.00001593774,0.00000652288,0.000004883459,0.001022292],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8760943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07507757489754922,"score_gpt":0.332331606111525,"score_spread":0.2572540312139758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}