{"id":"W1951995802","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.027.004","title":"Propositions théoriques et pratiques pour l’évaluation de programmes en négligence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Neglect; Fidelity; Valuation (finance); Psychological intervention; Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Intervention (counseling); Sustainability; Program evaluation; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2350944,0.003819591,0.003290487,0.01158516,0.004840313,0.01982814,0.007310394,0.01317116,0.0142733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3165068,0.001829605,0.005068734,0.006448558,0.03702588,0.02262264,0.005906126,0.009464514,0.001106564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0311242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0263502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0150427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009476488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7750989,0.1876726,0.007509149,0.005196586,0.02150774,0.003015046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3811152,0.5774028,0.01073628,0.007195103,0.02190688,0.001643675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001747118,0.0002974926,0.001080734,0.002037984,0.0002813696,0.0001489947,0.003306478,0.006727416,0.0000989919,0.9646133,0.002009727,0.01922281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004197279,0.000342048,0.000857543,0.005712874,0.0003041724,0.0001265138,0.004489484,0.02135279,0.0005841138,0.9533779,0.01234563,0.00008711503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03430713,0.02534413,0.5890598,0.1997686,0.00225547,0.006415056,0.0006303947,0.0003670384,0.1418524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5752633,0.008240607,0.3858025,0.009842915,0.0006433798,0.01539394,0.000264391,0.0000837137,0.004465325],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2350944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9432647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3343002875915336,"score_gpt":0.5692418239309505,"score_spread":0.2349415363394169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}