{"id":"W1953721976","doi":"10.15835/buasvmcn-agr:1173","title":"CONTRIBUTION OF THE AQUATIC INSECTS LARVAE IN THE EVALUATION OF THE HEALTH CONDITION OF THE SASAR RIVER BASIN WATERCOURSES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Agriculture","topic":"Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Larva; Structural basin; Drainage basin; Environmental science; Fishery; Aquatic insect; Ecology; Hydrology (agriculture); Biology; Water resource management; Geography; Geology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001207724,0.00009730099,0.0002072247,0.0000122968,0.0003203622,0.000001675015,0.0005778084,0.00005735846,0.000173274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001709119,0.00002920877,0.0000872185,0.0003955911,0.003445078,0.00005056311,0.0002807238,0.0001193417,7.043737e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005685084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001749886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004234128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000185922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978442,0.0007239222,0.0002269056,0.0001588051,0.0009036151,0.0001425743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999223,0.0001852394,0.000395773,0.0001160683,0.00004858761,0.00003131719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003017355,0.000841698,0.3257531,0.0001920712,0.00005630391,0.000003468517,0.01845763,0.001645899,0.6265392,0.0004007222,0.02320699,0.00260117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004331424,0.0009502473,0.9884525,0.0001883748,0.0000267851,0.00002815937,0.004916499,0.00002233908,0.003150027,0.00005770505,0.001727926,0.00004627418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98467,0.0001994092,8.291673e-7,0.01420082,0.0000464543,0.0004884494,0.00001641502,0.000001394126,0.0003762211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999368,0.000384144,0.00002069467,0.0001155682,0.00001155824,7.75358e-7,0.000005069414,6.180832e-7,0.00009356663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6626994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04840687291138609,"score_gpt":0.2682449018253079,"score_spread":0.2198380289139218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}