{"id":"W1953721976","doi":"10.15835/buasvmcn-agr:1173","title":"CONTRIBUTION OF THE AQUATIC INSECTS LARVAE IN THE EVALUATION OF THE HEALTH CONDITION OF THE SASAR RIVER BASIN WATERCOURSES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Agriculture","topic":"Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Larva; Structural basin; Drainage basin; Environmental science; Fishery; Aquatic insect; Ecology; Hydrology (agriculture); Biology; Water resource management; Geography; Geology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002837145,0.0003152881,0.0002044853,0.00124866,0.0004427151,0.0007102246,0.0001303425,0.0002325014,0.001278299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004134521,0.0001516668,0.0002412546,0.000475853,0.0002647586,0.0001402562,0.000287651,0.0002520454,0.0002128106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004573157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004467832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02169636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05340903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998011,0.00004423691,0.00001847427,0.00003101895,0.00005895108,0.00004622175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997725,0.00003975613,0.00004886801,0.000008567075,0.00007713443,0.00005323511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001940899,0.00006613595,0.9702861,0.00005173343,0.00004963691,0.000204919,0.0004450908,0.0001550539,0.01792742,0.00003258859,0.00006652283,0.01052059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001518023,0.0001620856,0.9970707,0.000009167227,0.000024022,0.0001506955,0.0008216201,0.0002062356,0.001228929,0.0000150156,0.0003067859,0.000003287047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982899,0.0002788477,0.00008416814,0.0000142368,0.0000033231,0.00001078955,0.000151581,0.000001910559,0.001165186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984676,0.0002344498,0.0003002339,0.000009015168,0.000003320482,0.000005756275,0.0001490451,0.000001604398,0.0008288918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02169636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04314017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04840687291138609,"score_gpt":0.2682449018253079,"score_spread":0.2198380289139218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}