{"id":"W1954482362","doi":"10.1111/ina.12220","title":"Benefit‐cost analysis of commercially available activated carbon filters for indoor ozone removal in single‐family homes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indoor Air","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers; U.S. Air Force; University of Texas at Austin","keywords":"HVAC; Environmental science; Activated carbon; Ozone; Filtration (mathematics); Environmental engineering; Demographics; Environmental economics; Engineering; Meteorology; Air conditioning; Geography; Statistics; Economics; Chemistry; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009318177,0.0001892367,0.0005540118,0.0002608382,0.00006708905,0.00001526944,0.0002924294,0.0001687133,0.0001520912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002674406,0.0001850585,0.0001145509,0.001368731,0.0001608822,0.0002346292,0.0001222292,0.0001718384,0.00005227169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005718259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009231206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008629019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004761902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980391,0.0001058807,0.0005480898,0.0003474657,0.0004322256,0.0005272802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998831,0.0002148778,0.0002616452,0.0003594337,0.0000364009,0.0002965808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00319497,0.002338073,0.810752,0.0002183154,0.0007032276,0.00005173057,0.01139389,0.02388285,0.07073297,0.0001684012,0.03655047,0.04001305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005575373,0.001194379,0.9084092,0.0001197467,0.0004272687,0.000005392058,0.001614527,0.01223568,0.02549972,0.0006212418,0.04348993,0.0008075444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898174,0.0000705164,0.0000905742,0.001447998,0.0001194569,0.0005725152,0.00008756526,0.00003631481,0.007757699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954303,0.0000127581,0.002068932,0.001788334,0.00003412053,0.00003473599,0.00007535643,0.0000214021,0.0005340719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09765715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09192388075452414,"score_gpt":0.3095516818330926,"score_spread":0.2176278010785684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}