{"id":"W1954672397","doi":"10.1002/eco.1374","title":"Alteration of flow regimes caused by large‐scale forest disturbance: a case study from a large watershed in the interior of British Columbia, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecohydrology","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Watershed; Environmental science; Magnitude (astronomy); Hydrology (agriculture); Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Flow (mathematics); Ecology; Geology; Biology; Geomorphology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002489981,0.00008800301,0.0002640804,0.0000130193,0.00007419195,0.00001497219,0.0002352223,0.00008763308,0.002611158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001018599,0.00009471978,0.00002741434,0.0001219195,0.0001315592,0.0001502014,0.0000482085,0.0001334832,0.00000882437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003129986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002544394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9610885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987595,0.0001610339,0.0003625716,0.0002832006,0.0001508578,0.000282829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995489,0.00007314135,0.0001086642,0.0002207247,0.000009941698,0.00003861346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001564733,0.0003968265,0.985935,0.000009337838,0.00002472451,0.0003938604,0.005353738,0.0002911421,0.0006615505,1.50875e-7,0.006815427,0.0001025753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004227956,0.0009123919,0.9644018,0.00002205867,0.00008495404,0.000187489,0.002867747,0.02180672,0.0004990252,0.0003354885,0.004293229,0.0003611753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998679,0.00006191738,0.00006292565,0.0002885422,0.0000792413,0.0005131657,0.0002227029,0.000006835055,0.00008566088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989688,0.00000454175,0.00002097679,0.0005637903,0.00001170865,0.0001219141,0.0001071937,0.000007628531,0.0001934663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03742727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003628486956453755,"score_gpt":0.1856868858561622,"score_spread":0.1820583988997085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}