{"id":"W1954895053","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079004","title":"Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: beyond inductive risk","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Underdetermination; Philosophy of science; Relevance (law); Empirical evidence; Positive economics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001956511,0.00008276718,0.0001959965,0.0001830832,0.002264022,0.00006775768,0.0004632824,0.00008648417,0.00003533098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001467209,0.00006232496,0.0001050098,0.0004425023,0.005358377,0.0002682789,0.00001766028,0.0002966257,0.00001191078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001363308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003351558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005896536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02032979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985697,0.0004737908,0.0002921287,0.0001038702,0.0003137353,0.0002467583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998005,0.0002253815,0.0004224388,0.0001134431,0.0009115855,0.0003222034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001392564,0.00001491137,0.0206473,0.000004521578,0.0001216742,0.00001949452,0.2204532,0.00001704531,0.00000669221,0.7491956,0.009326039,0.0001795335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001782614,0.00007854808,0.01099637,0.0000156371,0.00005724242,0.000006705474,0.03644233,2.809549e-7,0.00002454265,0.942164,0.009963288,0.00007277413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8842041,0.001162436,0.00001502883,0.02292542,0.001577134,0.0001464977,0.0001303841,0.000005840922,0.08983309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988721,0.000009813338,0.00003535921,0.0002024628,0.0006609469,0.000002238887,0.000001134843,0.000004657131,0.0002112866],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1929684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05882964602861137,"score_gpt":0.3322949212887322,"score_spread":0.2734652752601209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}