{"id":"W1954895053","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2015.1079004","title":"Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: beyond inductive risk","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Underdetermination; Philosophy of science; Relevance (law); Empirical evidence; Positive economics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2374507,0.001061731,0.003570115,0.008433225,0.007954271,0.01514791,0.005533514,0.01148335,0.00673547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5084341,0.001691546,0.002845907,0.004431225,0.1038118,0.03241247,0.01947192,0.01248591,0.0007241129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01192817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01355437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00368807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003189148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7677269,0.1677696,0.01315488,0.01359676,0.03146664,0.006285275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2178929,0.69336,0.02848477,0.03145968,0.02494703,0.003855643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074041,0.00002741229,0.002192265,0.0001964075,0.00009086958,0.0001482832,0.004962364,0.0006928078,0.0001062231,0.9853366,0.000535657,0.005637187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028343,0.00001095697,0.0003247297,0.0000960432,0.00001792103,0.00003036793,0.0005253028,0.0007544224,0.0001793582,0.9964767,0.001542206,0.00001363641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1611312,0.009439931,0.3583767,0.2713347,0.001174734,0.0007357781,0.0004390258,0.0002214345,0.1971467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448618,0.0009257901,0.04854284,0.003523245,0.0005711351,0.0004408527,0.00006746237,0.00007404057,0.0009927828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9920457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.940359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05882964602861137,"score_gpt":0.3322949212887322,"score_spread":0.2734652752601209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}