{"id":"W1955527663","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00382.x","title":"A critical appraisal of evidence‐based medicine: some ethical considerations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Engineering ethics; Evidence-based medicine; Duty; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Ethical theories; Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; MEDLINE; Alternative medicine; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3786431,0.002643629,0.004449068,0.01136818,0.009512165,0.02039678,0.006593169,0.03239538,0.001420051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4945028,0.002330594,0.002986769,0.006504602,0.05839157,0.01699832,0.01163796,0.02551974,0.00064588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01342323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02516532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001525518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001776032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4319306,0.4846711,0.04049184,0.003744615,0.0368666,0.002295306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2400405,0.691798,0.01504513,0.009925334,0.03894814,0.004242837],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003066455,0.0001531161,0.0009948161,0.01611987,0.000306253,0.004382571,0.04248662,0.003074656,0.001418826,0.7908251,0.04036267,0.09956882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002554232,0.000256309,0.0009428923,0.02639532,0.0001060854,0.003353396,0.0146128,0.004137042,0.0007192149,0.8025118,0.1464968,0.0002128925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003254898,0.08995921,0.09416603,0.786325,0.01284799,0.003428132,0.00005171373,0.00006586088,0.0099011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1880531,0.1017335,0.4763676,0.1661399,0.04077617,0.02280414,0.00008215184,0.0001177797,0.003925689],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7662437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.78986414577216,"score_gpt":0.7620428527969175,"score_spread":0.0278212929752425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}