{"id":"W1955527663","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00382.x","title":"A critical appraisal of evidence‐based medicine: some ethical considerations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Engineering ethics; Evidence-based medicine; Duty; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Ethical theories; Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; MEDLINE; Alternative medicine; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1603116,0.00009410654,0.0004755039,0.0003429861,0.0003008409,0.00001452767,0.0001473452,0.0004558478,0.003614252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.93279,0.00006358958,0.0001014526,0.000573315,0.0005605549,0.00145665,0.0000202865,0.003873522,0.00007021715],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002329622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01432465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009373483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003511929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9657383,0.02672044,0.004260273,0.0002284027,0.002644856,0.0004077403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2971286,0.6843285,0.003233231,0.0004872736,0.01391673,0.0009056265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002750561,0.004132458,0.1274976,0.00124735,0.0001111148,0.00009049845,0.01114541,0.001725063,0.0005946083,0.3289377,0.5119968,0.009770799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01800058,0.01026451,0.4183401,0.01009967,0.0008722035,0.0002486309,0.04928007,0.039454,0.00009276948,0.2462255,0.2064772,0.0006447529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1229075,0.002303182,0.006914236,0.8403649,0.01629921,0.00135263,0.000003240938,0.00001254417,0.009842523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642786,0.0004707866,0.01901495,0.01485024,0.00131847,0.00003672356,9.088424e-7,0.00000777241,0.00002147877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8413711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.78986414577216,"score_gpt":0.7620428527969175,"score_spread":0.0278212929752425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}