{"id":"W1956607329","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2015.09.015","title":"Boreal Shield forest disturbance and recovery trends using Landsat time series","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Remote Sensing of Environment","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Taiga; Boreal; Environmental science; Vegetation (pathology); Remote sensing; Physical geography; Geology; Forestry; Geography; Geomorphology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005934117,0.0002621463,0.0001377237,0.001378235,0.0002942788,0.000548329,0.000288407,0.0002033488,0.000882526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001206814,0.0001389576,0.0002903751,0.001246338,0.0001483252,0.0006450588,0.0002328218,0.000232499,0.0001568686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004486642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002994113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07715091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1878015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997746,0.00003802588,0.00003135297,0.00007451946,0.00004649653,0.00003505166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990405,0.0001642931,0.0003999989,0.00009613817,0.0001644963,0.0001345282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000972405,0.00005380542,0.9947107,0.000006690853,0.0000580814,0.00003485367,0.00007769646,0.0005348473,0.0004391347,0.00002958095,0.000394045,0.003563395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002499307,0.00001368843,0.9982211,0.000001926495,0.00001544575,0.00002923077,0.00009154985,0.001286275,0.00007546567,0.00001044921,0.0002497246,0.000002600254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971423,0.00004847763,0.0001181931,0.0000227144,0.000005724748,0.000004784784,0.002196147,0.00001571248,0.0004459491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960382,0.00003713059,0.0003419573,0.000008319839,0.000007880785,0.000005389791,0.003282449,0.000005119417,0.0002735493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07715091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1534037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01100811061396316,"score_gpt":0.1997226507815567,"score_spread":0.1887145401675935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}