{"id":"W195708333","doi":"10.5751/es-02070-120213","title":"Poverty and Environmental Services: Case Study in Way Besai Watershed, Lampung Province, Indonesia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Fund for Agricultural Development","keywords":"Poverty; Watershed; Geography; Environmental planning; Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Economic growth; Environmental science; Ecology; Economics; Ecosystem; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000431514,0.00009532648,0.00009998049,0.00001533077,0.0003152054,0.00001495032,0.00006422427,0.00008756219,0.00009669046],"category_scores_gemma":[7.461071e-7,0.00008162775,0.00002441322,0.00005369837,0.0001720604,0.00009366847,0.0003473551,0.00009919638,0.000009677206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001020622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002287506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008129046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01033437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992884,0.00004168923,0.0001198752,0.0002620003,0.0000841913,0.0002038389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997891,0.00003354622,0.00003407607,0.00008515223,9.314267e-7,0.00005717433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001029689,0.0002102115,0.985205,0.00001165177,0.00001708881,0.0002612482,0.01345909,0.00001269691,0.00005988527,0.000001123527,0.00008773571,0.00066398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007827442,0.00008755544,0.9502298,0.000001169996,0.00001838975,0.00004481158,0.04682983,0.0003049631,0.000007086095,0.000008653841,0.001588447,0.00009657018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990612,0.00002297756,0.000005466729,0.0001540549,0.00003338704,0.0003512363,0.00000211315,0.00001171838,0.0003578283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983108,0.00003458395,0.00007935074,0.001107176,0.00001098365,0.000003753624,0.000006641102,0.000003201585,0.0004435122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03497522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5766822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005548667588985426,"score_gpt":0.1881625552064918,"score_spread":0.1826138876175064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}