{"id":"W195741156","doi":"","title":"Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed Central","topic":"Science, Research, and Medicine","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Public relations; Product (mathematics); Political science; Business; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009403228,0.0001654229,0.0003634374,0.001231449,0.001092158,0.0001551007,0.0006365185,0.00007267843,0.0003086446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005624285,0.0001285017,0.00008428996,0.003080009,0.003505701,0.0005115501,0.0002421181,0.0009332563,0.00005476798],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001989328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006170494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001111476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009299483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896291,0.0001762228,0.0002875836,0.0006725821,0.003500069,0.005734478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942556,0.0001373697,0.00007045407,0.0005052853,0.0004630395,0.004568234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000234591,0.0006908308,0.551877,0.0001360842,0.00003485311,0.0008096761,0.01352276,5.919053e-7,0.001615097,0.004618655,0.1356117,0.2908481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001564065,0.0003678589,0.8947706,0.00005872058,0.00000357922,0.0005539926,0.002425611,0.0001075607,0.0008520875,0.00003934022,0.09913737,0.0001192067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9332495,0.000329938,0.00009085711,0.04216171,0.00280894,0.001056307,0.000005273681,0.00008280867,0.0202147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985211,0.000541284,0.0001834029,0.0008984455,0.007778329,0.00006431363,0.00001375837,0.00001948755,0.005289988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3428936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3847060178565412,"score_gpt":0.4290981115466633,"score_spread":0.04439209369012215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}