{"id":"W195741156","doi":"","title":"Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed Central","topic":"Science, Research, and Medicine","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Public relations; Product (mathematics); Political science; Business; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1672145,0.001099511,0.001924705,0.004051701,0.02179642,0.03939865,0.004516496,0.03097852,0.006111133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2062199,0.00141996,0.001671525,0.003459583,0.1286958,0.0342858,0.02070392,0.03760796,0.002513919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01513663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01966112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006215202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005081881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8053502,0.1368749,0.00530071,0.01196197,0.03060916,0.009903057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6504893,0.2974191,0.009302871,0.01969095,0.01555996,0.007537777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002511655,0.00002537648,0.001064027,0.0001899342,0.00005186825,0.0003539959,0.02934259,0.0001490516,0.0001420126,0.8972892,0.05594628,0.01542063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005074781,0.00003501551,0.0003898177,0.0006799852,0.00003263453,0.0002458643,0.008348528,0.0002976474,0.0002690854,0.7642732,0.225327,0.00005039411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.005413048,0.01657815,0.01325264,0.8399889,0.004466046,0.0001225678,0.0000511331,0.0001476567,0.1199798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3617441,0.01125523,0.01281019,0.5728577,0.008865508,0.0006948067,0.00007911973,0.0005082936,0.03118496],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8843251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3847060178565412,"score_gpt":0.4290981115466633,"score_spread":0.04439209369012215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}