{"id":"W1959388255","doi":"10.1109/icsmc.1998.727616","title":"A stochastic algorithm for risk assessment of in-stream contaminant","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Toxicant; Pollution; Human health; Risk assessment; Water quality; Computer science; Environmental science; Risk analysis (engineering); Water pollution; Ecosystem; Ecosystem health; Aquatic ecosystem; Natural (archaeology); Algorithm; Environmental chemistry; Environmental health; Ecology; Ecosystem services; Business; Toxicity; Chemistry; Computer security; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003073963,0.00007983896,0.0001390839,0.0000277087,0.00003980265,0.00000823969,0.00009758962,0.00003474814,0.003250202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001142701,0.00006475852,0.00004922252,0.0000957064,0.00007242332,0.00008694494,0.00004838568,0.00005910079,0.00005942093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001228998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004226957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000870688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002852038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991762,0.00005545877,0.0002471293,0.000166286,0.0001744873,0.0001804478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996332,0.00008181256,0.00009060142,0.0001390202,0.000004916888,0.00005045229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001736231,0.002889374,0.1213513,0.00004356732,0.00006685996,0.00000746903,0.002776653,0.01551939,0.002103793,0.004731688,0.00859814,0.8418944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001635451,0.0003768548,0.2950285,0.00001833554,0.00002340861,0.000002815376,0.0002576978,0.6963078,0.0009319219,0.0009507918,0.004247483,0.0002188873],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1657721,0.00001420627,0.8210328,0.0003950969,0.0001234161,0.0006141232,0.00009726405,0.00002376248,0.01192715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9550222,0.000009983753,0.04282878,0.00008602651,0.00001016844,0.00005071889,0.000003417261,0.000004735284,0.001983935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8416755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02589392760225567,"score_gpt":0.2889176479722466,"score_spread":0.2630237203699909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}