{"id":"W1960669369","doi":"10.1109/pes.2004.1372772","title":"Integrating security constraints in optimal power flow studies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004.","topic":"Power System Optimization and Stability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Power flow; Computer science; Power (physics); Transient (computer programming); Electric power system; Flow (mathematics); Power-flow study; Stability (learning theory); State (computer science); Steady state (chemistry); Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Operating system; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002238933,0.0009679224,0.0009721947,0.001011094,0.0004630984,0.001354943,0.0006453004,0.0007672065,0.002152173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007072305,0.0008152836,0.0005550904,0.0008311389,0.000976844,0.003122618,0.0009921498,0.001191235,0.0001836462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006160599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002331441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001888419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989988,0.000545526,0.00005436675,0.00007441691,0.0002636382,0.00006315717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997856,0.001642581,0.0001621824,0.00009537138,0.0002041349,0.0000397531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003234397,0.00002362479,0.0002628103,0.00004574901,0.00001605222,0.00005928781,0.00004852766,0.9176776,0.0009153407,0.06210519,0.0003070812,0.01850637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000136739,0.0000233165,0.00008425481,0.00001936392,0.000005036021,0.00001489043,0.00001511552,0.9531975,0.0005980778,0.04531559,0.0007027548,0.00001043742],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01451705,0.0001715904,0.9814855,0.0001311613,0.00002152565,0.00003157459,0.00002531197,0.0000454008,0.003570915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7113817,0.0006549484,0.2857414,0.0000665019,0.00007149638,0.0002182729,0.00008629581,0.0001237081,0.00165571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002331441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01184076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008383108265596479,"score_gpt":0.2317767881814443,"score_spread":0.2233936799158478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}