{"id":"W1961483450","doi":"10.14288/1.0078381","title":"An exploratory study of the hypothesis of divisible versus unitary competence in second language proficiency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Educational Technology and Assessment","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Varimax rotation; Vocabulary; Variance (accounting); Active listening; Exploratory factor analysis; Linguistics; Statistics; Grammar; Language proficiency; Natural language processing; Computer science; Factor analysis; Competence (human resources); Psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Structural equation modeling; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Psychometrics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01777255,0.0006306568,0.0008024666,0.001539002,0.001088514,0.003039131,0.001501601,0.001605873,0.009807052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06835251,0.0004528197,0.0009037399,0.001325574,0.005091012,0.004721178,0.003074632,0.001874073,0.0004655009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001464558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001857587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001417787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001063948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921496,0.005309142,0.0002582069,0.0009211488,0.001037413,0.0003245986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8385734,0.1544829,0.003173339,0.001700001,0.001245844,0.0008244842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004541065,0.00501916,0.445345,0.001122348,0.0002918935,0.00254425,0.2315405,0.00456979,0.01522808,0.1732507,0.001481537,0.1150655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001121792,0.01223893,0.4106258,0.0007519723,0.000242025,0.002654209,0.3027674,0.1011119,0.01216759,0.1465237,0.009508345,0.0002863006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984356,0.00005132178,0.008696255,0.0005799654,0.00001429464,0.0002312929,0.00008192348,0.00002051383,0.005968416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955072,0.00002897129,0.003643402,0.00009977672,0.00000810969,0.000295665,0.00004275656,0.00000815527,0.0003659464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01777255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09399128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01331952413533129,"score_gpt":0.2132693009884801,"score_spread":0.1999497768531488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}