{"id":"W1962580649","doi":"10.5539/jmsr.v5n1p32","title":"Comparative Assessment of Wiper and Conventional Carbide Inserts on Surface Roughness in the Turning of High Strength Steel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Materials Science Research","topic":"Advanced machining processes and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surface roughness; Materials science; Grinding; Machining; Response surface methodology; Roundness (object); Surface finish; Design of experiments; Mechanical engineering; Composite material; Metallurgy; Mathematics; Engineering; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00414285,0.00004993466,0.0001895157,0.0001555098,0.00004312229,0.0000516667,0.0002202065,0.00001872421,0.000007671572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001518158,0.00003244695,0.000009262079,0.0003484787,0.0002111923,0.0003063036,0.00003780249,0.0001492121,1.598972e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006754253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002191877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003156802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004743043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985508,0.0001377592,0.0002953815,0.00006647011,0.000812787,0.0001367702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990787,0.000202247,0.0001269891,0.00006768227,0.0004804767,0.00004388703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006008477,0.00005147478,0.0009669452,0.00007250896,0.000005945363,0.00000328145,0.00163454,0.7859541,0.2096854,0.001457199,0.0000231378,0.00008537911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002016644,0.001219677,0.1347224,0.0008358904,0.00001126906,0.00003865587,0.008698634,0.06473981,0.7853622,0.002097517,0.00007445872,0.0001828704],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988109,0.00009633067,0.0005632721,0.00005346852,0.0001357193,0.00006995029,0.000005017325,0.00000176375,0.0002635939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961292,0.00006801089,0.003769406,0.000002293065,0.00002187526,0.000001013089,6.780422e-7,0.00000338619,0.000004114502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7212142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1435837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09319316763829236,"score_gpt":0.4166822512119622,"score_spread":0.3234890835736699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}