{"id":"W1962580649","doi":"10.5539/jmsr.v5n1p32","title":"Comparative Assessment of Wiper and Conventional Carbide Inserts on Surface Roughness in the Turning of High Strength Steel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Materials Science Research","topic":"Advanced machining processes and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surface roughness; Materials science; Grinding; Machining; Response surface methodology; Roundness (object); Surface finish; Design of experiments; Mechanical engineering; Composite material; Metallurgy; Mathematics; Engineering; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005349037,0.0002334996,0.0003188973,0.0005012462,0.0001135314,0.0002395667,0.0001916415,0.0003200986,0.0006456677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001126613,0.0001681774,0.0003070871,0.0002544883,0.0001952421,0.0002887953,0.0001944466,0.0001953136,0.0001469053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009827693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004911181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001192512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991322,0.0001469645,0.00005362288,0.00007865661,0.0005104554,0.0000781066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985263,0.0005525103,0.0002678425,0.0001061011,0.0004640824,0.00008306406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001208691,0.0001409164,0.004530294,0.0002350195,0.00003064844,0.0001296175,0.0001206634,0.0006224953,0.977954,0.00002030047,0.00004800855,0.01495932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002697558,0.01358451,0.2123193,0.00002357313,0.000194378,0.0004786597,0.0005569669,0.003455793,0.7683209,0.00002085414,0.0009767647,0.00004128239],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983216,0.0005880356,0.0007832695,0.000005099498,0.000009350698,0.000009511429,0.00002592734,0.00001302679,0.0002441724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980819,0.0002810472,0.001163445,0.000007941642,0.000007258183,0.00000696765,0.00005627917,0.000006608803,0.0003886484],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0006456677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002828896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09319316763829236,"score_gpt":0.4166822512119622,"score_spread":0.3234890835736699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}