{"id":"W1962831321","doi":"10.1111/ecog.01534","title":"Assessing the spatial variability of density dependence in waterfowl populations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Centre de Géomatique du Québec; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Density dependence; Population; Waterfowl; Gompertz function; Population model; Population density; Population growth; Ecology; Spatial ecology; Statistics; Population size; Breeding bird survey; Spatial variability; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Mathematics; Biology; Demography; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008806681,0.00004492994,0.00006359218,0.00002625085,0.00006821303,0.00001130314,0.0001144083,0.00004472179,0.0001431091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001162728,0.00003356882,0.00002841467,0.000260688,0.0001434133,0.000241437,0.00006445293,0.00008290632,0.00002494244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002759254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001214494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002481659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00659865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999352,0.0001685843,0.0001459057,0.0001249104,0.0001109408,0.00009770014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996775,0.00006593794,0.00005703986,0.0001615721,0.00000973059,0.00002821156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003600708,0.0000401531,0.9982107,7.79619e-7,0.000001535611,5.528645e-7,0.0001922591,0.0004851986,0.00006170064,0.00009215626,0.0001064622,0.0008049458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009154842,0.00001175144,0.9861038,0.000002075596,0.000004842087,0.000001124581,0.00005880214,0.001398284,0.0001097485,0.01212741,0.00005168054,0.00003894385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950212,0.000002590285,0.002363462,0.0004495979,0.0001482829,0.00009226864,6.647251e-7,0.000009344393,0.001912634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988194,3.845731e-7,0.001030715,0.0001185343,0.00001222262,0.0000065772,0.000002773997,0.000001886614,0.000007477022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01210686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3751542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03878388262945295,"score_gpt":0.2765410333750151,"score_spread":0.2377571507455622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}