{"id":"W1962831321","doi":"10.1111/ecog.01534","title":"Assessing the spatial variability of density dependence in waterfowl populations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Centre de Géomatique du Québec; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Density dependence; Population; Waterfowl; Gompertz function; Population model; Population density; Population growth; Ecology; Spatial ecology; Statistics; Population size; Breeding bird survey; Spatial variability; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Mathematics; Biology; Demography; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003409586,0.0003070459,0.0003137863,0.0008235976,0.0003413156,0.000787311,0.0007369115,0.0006895068,0.0004125572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136748,0.0004007836,0.0006221511,0.000527879,0.0006741307,0.001259121,0.0007868617,0.0005025323,0.00005300437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007775634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003904542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01706505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01473637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989824,0.0004964877,0.00007107238,0.0002657479,0.0001085632,0.00007565896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923195,0.005434911,0.000982936,0.0007136735,0.0004029232,0.0001461173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001113499,0.00007054703,0.7136352,0.0000226239,0.0003292695,0.0001379193,0.0004254484,0.2703316,0.002615422,0.003478134,0.0001508455,0.008691642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001375098,0.00007313283,0.3475977,0.000012177,0.00005646112,0.0001201219,0.0002893708,0.6477358,0.0006792521,0.003150302,0.0002318131,0.00004022085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924475,0.00002677029,0.007082411,0.00003560915,0.000001354383,0.000004988927,0.00005296895,0.00002035572,0.0003281362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991479,0.000009763483,0.0007340064,0.000004995748,0.00000120717,0.000003749665,0.00006057404,0.000002573141,0.00003519669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01706505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03393143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03878388262945295,"score_gpt":0.2765410333750151,"score_spread":0.2377571507455622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}