{"id":"W1963506671","doi":"10.1109/antem.2010.5552568","title":"An accessible two-dimensional moment method analysis for composite antenna models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Method of moments (probability theory); Moment (physics); Computer science; Antenna (radio); Composite number; Scattering; Computational electromagnetics; Radiation pattern; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm; Mathematics; Physics; Electromagnetic field; Telecommunications; Optics; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000179727,0.0001602927,0.0002838951,0.000227579,0.00007054062,0.00003345012,0.0002324382,0.00007803699,0.00004619904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005668982,0.0001295138,0.0001310808,0.0003901074,0.00002859842,0.0003615209,0.00003367106,0.0001599641,0.000003293172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001354274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005963253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001496776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008535676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991856,0.000007929768,0.0001884602,0.0002301855,0.0001137584,0.0002741119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994019,0.00005407675,0.00002636252,0.0003679226,0.00007310371,0.00007661029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004909942,0.00001816336,0.0001670099,0.000005480081,0.0001412798,6.18779e-7,0.00001151,0.4979061,0.4963832,0.002975047,0.00001858346,0.002368044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002459712,0.0000207074,0.0002517163,0.000002113761,0.0001375423,0.000001600031,0.00003742596,0.894191,0.09583083,0.008901351,0.0002057516,0.0001739959],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2751254,0.00007081786,0.7233856,0.00006147151,0.0001249475,0.0001218204,0.00001563588,0.00079199,0.00030236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5642868,0.000005833919,0.4354927,0.00003002013,0.00001259307,0.00002664306,0.00001874886,0.00001448534,0.0001121632],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4005524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5281419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02699529159948803,"score_gpt":0.3224421612539264,"score_spread":0.2954468696544384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}