{"id":"W1963506671","doi":"10.1109/antem.2010.5552568","title":"An accessible two-dimensional moment method analysis for composite antenna models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Method of moments (probability theory); Moment (physics); Computer science; Antenna (radio); Composite number; Scattering; Computational electromagnetics; Radiation pattern; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm; Mathematics; Physics; Electromagnetic field; Telecommunications; Optics; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003679259,0.0005205465,0.0004110805,0.0006134047,0.0003193518,0.0007676087,0.000568273,0.000771788,0.002894456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009413885,0.0002290367,0.0008194951,0.0003562881,0.0005057689,0.0009263182,0.0007738213,0.0008068983,0.0009471731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002577763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003546371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004418411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000495073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998254,0.00005882492,0.000005222921,0.00001871824,0.00007975613,0.00001202837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997886,0.00009931723,0.00002196122,0.00003425399,0.00004232709,0.00001360809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003968731,0.00005822591,0.0003577384,0.0001436077,0.00003011542,0.0002688598,0.0001410072,0.243118,0.02266913,0.6956353,0.00478161,0.03275674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004451755,0.00001831226,0.0001258881,0.00001280889,0.000005755002,0.00010744,0.00001360121,0.9064454,0.001465893,0.08509126,0.006695131,0.00001409409],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004428306,0.0002081044,0.9871606,0.0001535282,0.00004802138,0.00001584421,0.00006431636,0.0001449378,0.007776412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3189583,0.001358564,0.6514459,0.0002965137,0.0003161719,0.0002442537,0.0003184738,0.0005619454,0.02649978],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002894456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009682953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02699529159948803,"score_gpt":0.3224421612539264,"score_spread":0.2954468696544384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}