{"id":"W1963541556","doi":"10.1239/jap/1189717532","title":"Characterizations of Conditional Comonotonicity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Probability","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Generalization; Representation (politics); Conditional expectation; Conditional probability distribution; Field (mathematics); Conditional random field; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Econometrics; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007045297,0.00008187617,0.0003211281,0.0002227563,0.00007465687,0.00003519456,0.0003648756,0.00007630598,0.0003070286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007195857,0.0000590795,0.0001389983,0.0005863464,0.0001661651,0.0002420176,0.00003738298,0.0001631294,0.00001371216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004605437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001735038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001649731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005381559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971261,0.00005396038,0.001523424,0.0001468608,0.001017616,0.000132061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963504,0.0006900954,0.001472171,0.0002734575,0.001102312,0.0001115657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00320185,0.002706432,0.4088417,0.00003885401,0.0001867845,0.00001835733,0.003527843,0.05094712,0.03353926,0.3532209,0.004775277,0.1389957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006578296,0.0001275101,0.5066604,0.000007248168,0.0000251471,0.00002549993,0.0001794049,0.0006368825,0.01711562,0.4632786,0.01116774,0.0001181444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8453085,0.00001170834,0.1440526,0.0001902534,0.0001839128,0.0001770659,0.00002152546,0.000005702669,0.01004876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857755,0.00002063609,0.01399521,0.00007401239,0.0000924156,0.00000112554,0.00000694707,0.000003998065,0.00003013123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.140467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3361748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07150790968494311,"score_gpt":0.3649525039004883,"score_spread":0.2934445942155453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}