{"id":"W1963541556","doi":"10.1239/jap/1189717532","title":"Characterizations of Conditional Comonotonicity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Probability","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Generalization; Representation (politics); Conditional expectation; Conditional probability distribution; Field (mathematics); Conditional random field; Mathematical economics; Discrete mathematics; Econometrics; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003026307,0.00067352,0.0007954687,0.002320317,0.001029263,0.002377615,0.001309689,0.0009481546,0.007080913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01118538,0.0003520767,0.0009021466,0.001983347,0.00401236,0.005557412,0.003276603,0.002109897,0.0004956097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001369822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008246739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001244611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000753569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973795,0.0006016264,0.0001953407,0.0006259362,0.0007683054,0.0004292566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916639,0.003077843,0.001449725,0.001178855,0.001797444,0.0008322363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001223838,0.000008547677,0.0006289746,0.00002270871,0.00001435795,0.00007217556,0.0001047897,0.002576196,0.0005122301,0.9923319,0.0002883077,0.003427633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000600765,0.00003484761,0.001230297,0.00002415779,0.00001485461,0.0001653141,0.0000982156,0.02365683,0.0005331443,0.9713814,0.002827055,0.00002783643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2043249,0.001845514,0.7396756,0.001649358,0.0001553802,0.00008279036,0.0006134151,0.0002782251,0.05137485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741916,0.0007551718,0.01885235,0.0003752375,0.0002293455,0.00009015161,0.0003903513,0.00009495682,0.005020805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007080913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02368802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07150790968494311,"score_gpt":0.3649525039004883,"score_spread":0.2934445942155453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}