{"id":"W1963636653","doi":"10.1139/x10-179","title":"Using preference information in developing alternative forest plans","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Optimization and Mathematical Programming","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Preference; Preference elicitation; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Variety (cybernetics); Operations research; Group decision-making; Process (computing); Management science; Function (biology); Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Geography; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007137609,0.00006300207,0.0001017737,0.0007513694,0.00007741393,0.0001376627,0.0002212359,0.00006610419,0.00004411584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004422201,0.00005856067,0.00002098736,0.0003459099,0.00007042716,0.0005760826,0.00001065799,0.0006522647,0.00001294722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001929163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006283598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001427976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1652894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990801,0.00002314166,0.0002976777,0.00003776132,0.0002219154,0.0003393881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999201,0.00008256637,0.00003804129,0.0000764114,0.0002996355,0.000302329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002014828,0.00001797651,0.1752853,0.000376838,0.00005540885,0.0001815075,0.006619737,0.6778048,0.0002756719,0.1183432,0.0008240169,0.02019537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001432707,0.0001447018,0.07428889,0.0008987813,0.000009790401,0.0003304106,0.0013466,0.8497223,0.001128546,0.03409964,0.03606456,0.0005330762],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9487582,0.00002094761,0.04703,0.0001241893,0.0002745467,0.0001375265,0.000004355774,0.000008161533,0.003642062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833562,0.00001031579,0.01654189,0.00001259752,0.00005652219,0.000002482755,0.000002509292,0.000008992986,0.000008422985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1719175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8499419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1208528920106481,"score_gpt":0.3366251721265314,"score_spread":0.2157722801158832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}