{"id":"W1963718791","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007053","title":"Trading quality for relevance: non-health decision-makers’ use of evidence on the social determinants of health","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"School for Public Health Research; Economic and Social Research Council; National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Medicine; Relevance (law); Quality (philosophy); Public health; Social determinants of health; Environmental health; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.466401,0.00106733,0.004171039,0.01252259,0.007725545,0.04516087,0.005479721,0.01150924,0.008526696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7598129,0.002087775,0.001937319,0.01049966,0.0575427,0.05120439,0.02934735,0.01489486,0.001366399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01782057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04147848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006531321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005517554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3328426,0.5323762,0.04922519,0.01337028,0.06708931,0.005096338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09131318,0.7983621,0.03487444,0.03987463,0.03056852,0.005007171],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001096275,0.0002765555,0.04446575,0.02417547,0.001948671,0.001588025,0.2808721,0.001263269,0.00286751,0.209387,0.02789102,0.4041683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004290057,0.0006388467,0.01385371,0.06314272,0.001416576,0.00133148,0.09776165,0.001686693,0.002249149,0.6165597,0.200452,0.0004785062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0773525,0.07809795,0.06602851,0.6961841,0.00514402,0.001501192,0.000620119,0.0002037113,0.07486778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8918765,0.0138288,0.03154,0.05809391,0.001684282,0.0008518788,0.0002247495,0.0002201048,0.001679671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.466401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6580226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7607533845341597,"score_gpt":0.6383061915189057,"score_spread":0.1224471930152541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}