{"id":"W1963737966","doi":"10.1007/s10979-009-9180-1","title":"Predicting recidivism amongst sexual offenders: A multi-site study of Static-2002.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Safety Canada","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Wisconsin Department of Health Services; Public Safety Canada","keywords":"Recidivism; Psychology; Danish; Sex offense; Sample (material); Risk assessment; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Demography; Clinical psychology; Sexual abuse; Environmental health; Medicine; Computer security; Computer science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003298578,0.0003423449,0.000488638,0.0001639772,0.0003227001,0.00006475575,0.000253672,0.0001562231,0.0002939535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008445208,0.0003421191,0.00006108667,0.000161818,0.0001954323,0.0001816163,0.00005585469,0.0003685663,0.00003585918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003364816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001138125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001913369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002507524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975981,0.000172194,0.0006826158,0.0006899575,0.0003304673,0.0005266317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986744,0.00005539906,0.0003279973,0.0006800958,0.00006457901,0.0001975394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002619015,0.01415374,0.8481997,0.00004885994,0.0002280271,0.0002854323,0.07845125,0.000001780328,0.01005251,0.02070351,0.0155661,0.01204723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005510843,0.004748851,0.9688907,0.00005001431,0.0003353101,0.00004298079,0.01900669,0.000009982111,0.00004661481,0.0001268954,0.0007877297,0.0004433746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835641,0.0001149512,0.00002525595,0.00003306837,0.007164511,0.0009145752,0.00005300306,0.000160367,0.007970198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972923,7.512913e-7,0.0003361539,0.0003063669,0.0004508614,0.00006673774,0.00002201731,0.00004731585,0.001477436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1206911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06266505535829843,"score_gpt":0.3532173837213495,"score_spread":0.2905523283630511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}