{"id":"W1963788254","doi":"10.1016/j.mechatronics.2008.02.003","title":"Design considerations for an automotive magnetorheological brake","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mechatronics","topic":"Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids","field":"Engineering","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Magnetorheological fluid; Brake; Automotive industry; Brake pad; Finite element method; Automotive engineering; Mechanical engineering; Engineering; Material selection; Torque; Hydraulic brake; Stress (linguistics); Structural engineering; Materials science; Physics; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001407938,0.0001293823,0.000165887,0.00003368414,0.0002147022,0.00002091923,0.00007838295,0.0001397056,0.0003464565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001366461,0.0001067771,0.00006020326,0.00005417138,0.00005121362,0.0001495895,0.00001168015,0.0001136465,0.00004820422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003627655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004397457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.965178e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000545635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992579,0.00005126562,0.0001825765,0.0001653042,0.00008373559,0.0002591803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994128,0.0002587342,0.00001302114,0.0001449035,0.00007950476,0.00009103683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005562336,0.0001528402,0.00006279642,0.00001931896,0.00009063385,0.00001996821,0.0006476401,0.5744094,0.02262071,0.3739115,0.02589989,0.002109627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007633893,0.0006486909,0.0001950568,0.000002080458,0.00001656288,0.00003890107,0.00002422732,0.9578156,0.004343862,0.03266325,0.003249075,0.0002392827],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01340522,0.0003890547,0.9836774,0.0002673478,0.0002867679,0.0004051312,0.00001892327,0.000650708,0.0008994773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922365,0.0000670076,0.07665955,0.0003623325,0.0001276268,0.0001111882,0.00002003773,0.00001845474,0.0002688688],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9089597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4354243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0679254631299464,"score_gpt":0.2396299990414195,"score_spread":0.1717045359114731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}