{"id":"W1963830678","doi":"10.1002/jps.23437","title":"Corrections for “Thermodynamic Modeling of Activity Coefficient and Prediction of Solubility. Parts 1 and 2,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 95(4) 2006, pp 790–809","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","topic":"Crystallization and Solubility Studies","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"UNIQUAC; Non-random two-liquid model; Solubility; Thermodynamics; Section (typography); Binary number; Activity coefficient; Table (database); Chemistry; Computer science; Mathematics; Physical chemistry; Data mining; Physics; Aqueous solution","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005292512,0.0002922108,0.0009362281,0.0003272799,0.0005305866,0.000179184,0.0005364527,0.0002372863,0.0001964718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009378598,0.0002074191,0.0002517102,0.0004703717,0.003671946,0.0007030126,0.000179086,0.0007389676,4.901699e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001019957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004917339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000332734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007207503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995684,0.0004124838,0.001524559,0.0004208173,0.001458916,0.0004991897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958035,0.001127862,0.001529377,0.0001223966,0.001184254,0.0002326261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001736202,0.003243704,0.01363576,0.005287802,0.0007407482,0.00004702538,0.004910629,0.07576121,0.7762762,0.0007761905,0.09295803,0.02462653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001838166,0.00205378,0.0006584341,0.0006913111,0.0007061819,0.0003036571,0.001058152,0.9575084,0.01371668,0.001396325,0.01966503,0.0004039149],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9355703,0.004489482,0.02925728,0.02693006,0.002766429,0.0006337591,0.0002073996,0.00001367127,0.0001316356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929784,0.002444193,0.00169813,0.002204396,0.0006209572,0.000006989838,0.000001159683,0.00001386274,0.0000319336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8817472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1112952842307291,"score_gpt":0.3746674773797311,"score_spread":0.263372193149002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}