{"id":"W1963919356","doi":"10.1016/j.quaint.2015.03.016","title":"A connection between geomagnetic intensity and climatic anomalies recorded in Chinese loess","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quaternary International","topic":"Geology and Paleoclimatology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China; University of Alberta","keywords":"Earth's magnetic field; Geology; Quaternary; Loess; Milankovitch cycles; δ18O; Climatology; Climate change; Forcing (mathematics); Paleontology; Glacial period; Oceanography; Stable isotope ratio; Magnetic field","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004429444,0.0001039282,0.0001779285,0.0001909798,0.00004723074,0.00003409157,0.0001858158,0.00008604195,0.0006589396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000173975,0.00008585273,0.00002145686,0.0001027928,0.0001514282,0.0002109887,0.00003296683,0.0001913795,0.0002962629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003981766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002977159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001613897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005242503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990594,0.0001237955,0.0002195487,0.0002155756,0.0001772587,0.0002043848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994753,0.0002031299,0.0000556384,0.00008873084,0.00007439053,0.0001028172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001436286,0.00001328598,0.9983059,0.000008607376,0.00001862473,0.00006960169,0.0002697674,0.00008044365,0.000001682135,0.00003741331,0.00004474938,0.001006271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005889984,0.0001719248,0.9690024,0.00001398128,0.000004083207,0.0001959838,0.0001827516,0.0223519,0.000005475163,0.007305288,0.00008400397,0.00009322848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911762,0.0001429638,0.00002953661,0.001903685,0.0006167713,0.00009799169,0.00001841624,0.00002406264,0.005990382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990789,0.00003629088,0.0002104222,0.0001170215,0.0001106054,0.000002345669,0.0001766842,0.000002065625,0.0002656401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02930354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7214926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03637888951410815,"score_gpt":0.2815186628673421,"score_spread":0.2451397733532339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}