{"id":"W1963942235","doi":"10.1088/0967-3334/32/7/s07","title":"Minimizing EIT image artefacts from mesh variability in finite element models","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physiological Measurement","topic":"Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Finite element method; Electrical impedance tomography; Isotropy; Polygon mesh; Inverse problem; Mathematical analysis; Anisotropy; Node (physics); Inverse; Iterative reconstruction; Geometry; Projection (relational algebra); Mathematics; Algorithm; Computer science; Physics; Acoustics; Tomography; Computer vision; Engineering; Structural engineering; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006073337,0.0002487595,0.0003322409,0.00006031392,0.00003660184,0.00001468538,0.0002293266,0.0001024334,0.0002538017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083217,0.0001855283,0.0001291968,0.0002785143,0.00004579096,0.0001311118,0.00005093783,0.0002742099,0.00004361123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001329502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001125773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008077389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000183124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982019,0.0001438706,0.0004004146,0.000386584,0.0003765893,0.0004906555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994067,0.00008247611,0.0000381411,0.000275214,0.00006889498,0.0001285635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002979269,0.002184871,0.003152233,0.0001590222,0.0003251483,0.00004057354,0.001093908,0.0101949,0.9394881,0.001813196,0.001284479,0.03996563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002101661,0.0007116985,0.2624582,0.0002045448,0.00009666202,8.5688e-7,0.00009700267,0.2597013,0.1867596,0.2859177,0.0003043073,0.001646448],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.941461,0.000637321,0.04138902,0.0000599827,0.0002983311,0.0007484027,0.00003562471,0.0006181244,0.01475221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947446,0.0001006655,0.004886396,0.0000848104,0.00006396748,0.00009585444,0.000008493552,0.00001377255,0.000001455048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7527285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7565625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1034165472711363,"score_gpt":0.2154272323596282,"score_spread":0.1120106850884919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}