{"id":"W1963956195","doi":"10.2514/6.2011-6573","title":"Synthesis of Optimal Finite Frequency Controllers for Flexible Robotic Manipulator Control","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference","topic":"Control and Stability of Dynamical Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Robot manipulator; Manipulator (device); Computer science; Control engineering; Optimal control; Control (management); Automatic frequency control; Robot; Engineering; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004892997,0.0003371447,0.0009119856,0.0001016178,0.0001351163,0.00005455404,0.0002824893,0.0002062372,0.00005525416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002589275,0.000319581,0.0002026536,0.0001481386,0.0002157224,0.0002370633,0.00001172211,0.0001538569,0.000007562402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005043235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007309785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001984758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005995427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997989,0.00009004925,0.000887821,0.0003777615,0.0002022257,0.0004531629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980853,0.0007738132,0.0001874193,0.0003581618,0.0004339428,0.0001613595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00494288,0.0009679573,0.1663029,0.006320947,0.006100087,0.00002798669,0.005036581,0.1015001,0.1788143,0.4529091,0.0006151155,0.07646215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00947229,0.000307648,0.05368448,0.0004666013,0.0004741384,0.000005374392,0.0002779695,0.9209647,0.001836884,0.01145509,0.0003712297,0.0006835746],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1592508,0.00213756,0.8322661,0.000155804,0.0004851423,0.001776702,0.0002381248,0.0003352109,0.003354562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979172,0.00003641627,0.001285866,0.00006618119,0.0000682233,0.0004978846,0.00001082926,0.00003547316,0.00008197842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8386663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01891722836210904,"score_gpt":0.20806097618194,"score_spread":0.1891437478198309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}