{"id":"W1963984539","doi":"10.1007/s00199-007-0297-5","title":"An ascending double auction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Revenue equivalence; Mathematical economics; Common value auction; Bidding; English auction; Vickrey auction; Microeconomics; Double auction; Auction theory; Generalized second-price auction; Walrasian auction; Bayesian game; Value (mathematics); Public finance; Object (grammar); Path (computing); Computer science; Repeated game; Game theory","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001359372,0.0006899287,0.000914276,0.0007141485,0.001104706,0.003955463,0.001122502,0.00124157,0.01617346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004811855,0.0003433093,0.0006450391,0.001064751,0.0009839742,0.004156751,0.001326187,0.001568552,0.001905258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009362409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001189744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005135851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000472405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989526,0.0003004978,0.00007215214,0.0001808586,0.0003434035,0.0001504219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983901,0.0005508572,0.000132096,0.0003803576,0.0003541632,0.0001924546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002903972,0.0001511299,0.0003538208,0.0001248774,0.00002549015,0.0001139288,0.00008180116,0.01182442,0.002673728,0.9305105,0.004291488,0.0495584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007581948,0.0001343673,0.0002988709,0.00003300858,0.0000304506,0.0004229509,0.00006395677,0.08890401,0.0016034,0.8944385,0.01396682,0.00002782887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1300337,0.001130962,0.5782024,0.001470175,0.0005695334,0.000199912,0.0004136594,0.0004263203,0.2875534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8114593,0.00101311,0.09060365,0.0002649814,0.0002294233,0.0001302157,0.0002828767,0.00007898531,0.09593751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01617346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05410558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08415161446976739,"score_gpt":0.4253590044755097,"score_spread":0.3412073900057424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}