{"id":"W1964009111","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0022497","title":"HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)—A Quantitative Ethics Appraisal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Checklist; Pre-exposure prophylaxis; Research ethics; Informed consent; Critical appraisal; Psychological intervention; Medicine; Family medicine; Clinical trial; Psychology; MEDLINE; Ethics committee; Systematic review; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Alternative medicine; Nursing; Pathology; Psychiatry; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4664768,0.00181673,0.003978296,0.0206563,0.003536459,0.006870308,0.003037871,0.002484818,0.004101746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6630476,0.001900268,0.003904408,0.0164171,0.00527724,0.006250443,0.007924783,0.002940485,0.0009235726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01353619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06842142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001536866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002508306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3497218,0.4896643,0.1191353,0.004232912,0.03508313,0.002162535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2216561,0.5290552,0.07545026,0.02318114,0.1461889,0.004468429],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001278725,0.0002805126,0.009078073,0.4717791,0.001902991,0.000719433,0.04837449,0.001234532,0.002606136,0.01857043,0.02356168,0.4206139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002067374,0.003959895,0.02291951,0.6634781,0.006125521,0.001527661,0.03148336,0.003020217,0.004994372,0.03029385,0.2296377,0.0004925079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07289562,0.1902834,0.1541758,0.06582967,0.006721183,0.4778209,0.005287447,0.0004473107,0.02653859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2019094,0.06454978,0.3063455,0.006510073,0.001299724,0.4161521,0.00146332,0.0001696449,0.001600413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4664768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6579291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1885551510313949,"score_gpt":0.3782591232463425,"score_spread":0.1897039722149475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}