{"id":"W1964020029","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.08.019","title":"Enhancing forest carbon sequestration in China: Toward an integration of scientific and socio-economic perspectives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Reforestation; Greenhouse gas; China; Agency (philosophy); Position (finance); Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Natural resource economics; Political science; Agroforestry; Ecology; Economics; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004719947,0.0001214716,0.0001500511,0.0001814784,0.00005515503,0.00005293443,0.0001442113,0.00003256255,0.0002778346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002197508,0.0001134869,0.0000476155,0.00007615659,0.0002472561,0.0005484427,0.0001121792,0.00008762399,0.00001433935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005074006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003954942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005456388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005458033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989405,0.0000461849,0.0004174015,0.000196253,0.000244015,0.0001556217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995363,0.00000761383,0.0002908978,0.0001218956,0.00000134845,0.00004198506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001974295,0.001332836,0.8204502,0.0001001119,0.0000854857,0.00007017333,0.008924942,0.03236091,0.1070324,0.01173297,0.000623862,0.01708866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005361946,0.0002409105,0.9905575,0.00003103674,0.00003513431,0.000005441232,0.001964954,0.002166346,0.00132763,0.002748949,0.0002510529,0.0001348468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926408,0.00007610006,0.00009529174,0.0001217033,0.00009803327,0.0001849073,0.000002638354,0.000003990665,0.006776553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806,0.00009354229,0.001015815,0.000007940013,0.00005921216,0.000003460443,0.000007582772,0.000009499254,0.0007429671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1701072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4627862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006066725318570487,"score_gpt":0.2158527871993939,"score_spread":0.2097860618808234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}