{"id":"W1964173941","doi":"10.1007/s00244-003-2123-9","title":"Assessment of the Probabilistic Ecological Risk Assessment-Toxic Equivalent Combination Approach for Evaluating Pesticide Mixture Toxicity to Zooplankton in Outdoor Microcosms","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Microcosm; Pesticide; Chlorpyrifos; Zooplankton; Ecotoxicology; Toxicology; Daphnia; Environmental chemistry; Environmental science; Diazinon; Toxicity; Population; Chemistry; Biology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001016757,0.000269739,0.0004612136,0.0001250289,0.0002631186,0.00001024149,0.0003061848,0.0002189213,0.0005810848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003825073,0.000227195,0.0001232255,0.0001634278,0.0008052603,0.0001093308,0.0003559712,0.00033348,0.000002365076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000348374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000300043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001057448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001611342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970411,0.0009724671,0.0006805081,0.0006177233,0.0002657509,0.000422433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980153,0.001108037,0.0004756784,0.0002817957,0.000003871804,0.0001153238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006906272,0.002131891,0.6167779,0.00004390576,0.0000275782,9.811079e-7,0.000326218,0.004654948,0.3687455,0.003934088,0.0000149124,0.003273056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001828449,0.002094388,0.962869,0.00001471485,0.00006719858,0.00001235046,0.0003312066,0.01156548,0.01642179,0.004467155,0.0001105159,0.0002176996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832793,0.00002623689,0.007425751,0.0001568254,0.0001152048,0.002482285,0.00009085557,0.000008902904,0.006414609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773192,0.00004305059,0.02159777,0.0002822029,0.000005777495,0.0004229126,0.00004729108,0.00001496577,0.0002668099],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3523237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9264742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01588807150821892,"score_gpt":0.2854417367322788,"score_spread":0.2695536652240599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}