{"id":"W1964203160","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.721.21","title":"Benchmark Solutions for Magnetic Fields in the Presence of Two Superconducting Spheres","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Materials science forum","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"SPHERES; Benchmark (surveying); Conductor; Magnetic field; Scalar (mathematics); Boundary value problem; Scalar field; Superconductivity; Materials science; Scalar potential; Perfect conductor; Physics; Classical mechanics; Mathematical analysis; Condensed matter physics; Mathematics; Geometry; Optics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001116407,0.0007379199,0.001092094,0.001294623,0.001064609,0.001655483,0.00114283,0.002653,0.004572953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007262372,0.0003239769,0.0005020895,0.001001046,0.001251753,0.0007828443,0.001300269,0.0008783039,0.0003235173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001141443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009227691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003656722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002511516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995703,0.0001291242,0.00002175824,0.0000366973,0.0001547781,0.00008729188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997674,0.001424304,0.0002270228,0.0001036106,0.0004125109,0.0001585705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002670264,0.0001142758,0.001533832,0.0003894894,0.00004581123,0.0004980843,0.0001718179,0.8797046,0.004335383,0.1022025,0.003508268,0.007229009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006936309,0.00005947391,0.0003746644,0.00005689828,0.00001109439,0.00008038512,0.00008481014,0.9727836,0.002455737,0.02261772,0.001387496,0.00001887406],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7103342,0.002237902,0.1363312,0.003095806,0.0005175047,0.0002368437,0.001916679,0.0006160986,0.1447138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388443,0.0004992414,0.04870448,0.0002172105,0.0001534819,0.0002146934,0.001108264,0.000138914,0.01011937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004572953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01529807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02028101478606305,"score_gpt":0.2780281145452333,"score_spread":0.2577470997591703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}