{"id":"W1964211529","doi":"10.1108/tqm-01-2014-0011","title":"Autopietic decisions approach: a governance research network case study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The TQM Journal","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Autopoiesis; Originality; Corporate governance; Constitution; Knowledge management; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Social network analysis; Computer science; Process management; Business; Management; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Artificial intelligence; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06845598,0.0001929871,0.0004665504,0.0002215044,0.00352752,0.001913561,0.002587297,0.00006605959,0.0004561812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01257753,0.00009502375,0.0002398959,0.002132543,0.0001927482,0.0002664389,0.0009696481,0.001375847,0.0006850503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009349146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001637548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002222205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003281685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874355,0.004419259,0.001365185,0.0005545965,0.005266748,0.0009587224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816766,0.01466821,0.0005452336,0.001806334,0.000983907,0.0003196938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001642092,0.0006156008,0.01046185,0.000001816008,0.00008620585,0.002746139,0.0100377,0.02590287,0.00001187092,0.07045534,0.3933264,0.48619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001630694,0.0007187569,0.03639736,0.0001026014,0.00003333635,0.0567336,0.04140754,0.10137,5.487426e-7,0.5762416,0.1849752,0.0003887966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7971175,0.001663675,0.1684943,0.0009548157,0.002067106,0.0007071358,0.000002555598,0.00004399717,0.02894895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898555,0.00001011076,0.002448477,0.0001258721,0.001906497,0.00001431161,3.923276e-8,0.00001989907,0.005619322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5057862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5191377347749903,"score_gpt":0.5060860346328442,"score_spread":0.01305170014214607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}