{"id":"W1964213907","doi":"10.1002/sim.1026","title":"An improved CML estimation procedure for the Rasch model with item response data","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research","keywords":"Rasch model; Estimator; Item response theory; Polytomous Rasch model; Computer science; Ordinal data; Statistics; Conditional independence; Independence (probability theory); Goodness of fit; Local independence; Econometrics; Mathematics; Psychometrics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01163233,0.000941878,0.001466007,0.001869467,0.0008541429,0.001151032,0.001652747,0.001187635,0.008320136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05301939,0.0006803228,0.001156193,0.003341866,0.0005754777,0.002488071,0.002176651,0.00218298,0.001806893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006933266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003332455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005943593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005699008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901502,0.006696315,0.000396264,0.001034054,0.001519477,0.0002036783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830598,0.01077812,0.0008378565,0.002271892,0.002899189,0.0001531277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003633336,0.0001953702,0.005727659,0.0004655643,0.0003200488,0.0001983354,0.0005051116,0.1265035,0.002986477,0.1478823,0.01193768,0.7029145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009944816,0.0001555591,0.003025841,0.00006461829,0.000076443,0.0002017028,0.00008093109,0.9163125,0.001896988,0.05854269,0.01946128,0.00008207381],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001416286,0.00005683773,0.9975049,0.00008638416,0.00002792233,0.0001084925,0.0001125385,0.0002902335,0.0003964866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05670493,0.0001521632,0.9396273,0.0001478887,0.0001067503,0.000854589,0.0004639733,0.0002055182,0.001736918],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01163233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06151831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5951936693828095,"score_gpt":0.5402817360493364,"score_spread":0.05491193333347311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}