{"id":"W1964272127","doi":"10.1006/mssp.2000.1337","title":"FREE-VIBRATION BEHAVIOUR OF A CRACKED CANTILEVER BEAM AND CRACK DETECTION","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing","topic":"Structural Health Monitoring Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Vibration; Cantilever; Structural engineering; Acoustics; Crack tip opening displacement; Stiffness; Spectrogram; Beam (structure); Materials science; Impulse (physics); Amplitude; Clamping; Modal; Normal mode; Crack closure; Fracture mechanics; Optics; Physics; Engineering; Computer science; Composite material; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002251502,0.0001907475,0.0001956655,0.0003862705,0.0001691598,0.0001689943,0.0003332025,0.0007590411,0.00398192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001345553,0.0001789397,0.0001603504,0.0001810638,0.000307441,0.0003539348,0.000168572,0.0002682707,0.0004007554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001507754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008378852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009755823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001192684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998173,0.00003051906,0.000005627021,0.00003196056,0.00009452501,0.00002007334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998695,0.0008316407,0.00006628796,0.00008774946,0.0002327915,0.00008660161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00111553,0.0001909393,0.005680313,0.0001672507,0.00005113923,0.0006088736,0.0004067262,0.02412704,0.9317061,0.001541263,0.000594635,0.03381032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006232801,0.0008238968,0.1203658,0.00003847876,0.00003448661,0.001115094,0.0002339683,0.7296702,0.143951,0.002437304,0.001208444,0.00005906333],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744871,0.0002992827,0.02210005,0.0001143493,0.0000160845,0.00001956895,0.0002038954,0.0001017105,0.002658015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952677,0.00005434852,0.002633207,0.00001670001,0.00000702898,0.000008332891,0.0001169955,0.00001846086,0.001877215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00398192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01332086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01731036191009019,"score_gpt":0.2517984589850563,"score_spread":0.2344880970749661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}