{"id":"W1964330514","doi":"10.1038/jes.2010.33","title":"Comparison of a toxicokinetic and a questionnaire-based approach to assess methylmercury intake in exposed individuals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Methylmercury; Toxicokinetics; Reference dose; Environmental health; Mercury (programming language); Tolerable daily intake; Food intake; Exposure assessment; Toxicology; Risk assessment; Chemistry; Animal science; Environmental chemistry; Bioaccumulation; Medicine; Body weight; Biology; Toxicity; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005986391,0.0001996752,0.0007311251,0.0003046105,0.0001287796,0.00001370771,0.0005039396,0.0001220849,0.000151463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001949307,0.0001591491,0.00008410528,0.0004378111,0.002032264,0.0003746409,0.0002445745,0.0004784189,0.0000110283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001450719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004892177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003264498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002266857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971145,0.0003898396,0.001211529,0.0003596781,0.0005041376,0.000420249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981369,0.0004759778,0.0007768683,0.000247871,0.00001224848,0.0003501653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002016287,0.0002363199,0.6705754,0.000004666592,0.000004624069,0.000001015717,0.0009779833,0.002234498,0.3220293,0.00008899483,0.00006136594,0.003765595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005276211,0.0006709147,0.9739617,0.00002764853,0.00001900344,0.00005229378,0.0008316278,0.0004266427,0.02252621,0.0004539585,0.000343437,0.0001590088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995848,0.0002272841,0.002596928,0.0004172066,0.0002404691,0.0002238888,0.000005721972,0.000004734409,0.0004357777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751171,0.00002515187,0.02429353,0.0005045026,0.0000331147,0.000009082787,0.000001313594,0.000008717209,0.000007434448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3033862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.748796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07229954691392906,"score_gpt":0.3633447663208138,"score_spread":0.2910452194068847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}