{"id":"W1964330514","doi":"10.1038/jes.2010.33","title":"Comparison of a toxicokinetic and a questionnaire-based approach to assess methylmercury intake in exposed individuals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Methylmercury; Toxicokinetics; Reference dose; Environmental health; Mercury (programming language); Tolerable daily intake; Food intake; Exposure assessment; Toxicology; Risk assessment; Chemistry; Animal science; Environmental chemistry; Bioaccumulation; Medicine; Body weight; Biology; Toxicity; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003087481,0.0007843807,0.0007894596,0.001289718,0.000526386,0.0007580966,0.0008968351,0.001437642,0.001058148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005937004,0.0004541737,0.0009582361,0.0008165937,0.0003851072,0.0006803757,0.0009055734,0.0007344399,0.0005049021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000750205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007657953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01008095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01335745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974065,0.001253293,0.0001941829,0.0003630136,0.0006754036,0.0001075985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962443,0.001775226,0.0003999055,0.0002636293,0.001101138,0.0002157999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02965234,0.008152381,0.8712666,0.0004187319,0.001390118,0.0001966765,0.003563704,0.001774162,0.03761442,0.000311633,0.0004672201,0.04519201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00110643,0.0413671,0.937387,0.00004425833,0.0007966504,0.0004688508,0.001593785,0.005929045,0.0100711,0.000204368,0.0009394796,0.00009187582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962747,0.0001711459,0.002209887,0.00006695729,0.00003247974,0.000183769,0.0002854583,0.00002536308,0.0007502549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924325,0.0002745249,0.004136219,0.0001706514,0.00002332979,0.0003389224,0.0005380427,0.00001598598,0.002069781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01008095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02004457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07229954691392906,"score_gpt":0.3633447663208138,"score_spread":0.2910452194068847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}