{"id":"W1964546519","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.058","title":"Impact of two particle measurement techniques on the determination of N95 class respirator filtration performance against ultrafine particles","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","topic":"Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail; Université de Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Concordia University; Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail","keywords":"Respirator; Scanning mobility particle sizer; Ultrafine particle; Particle size; Materials science; Aerosol; Electrical mobility; Particle-size distribution; Aerodynamic diameter; Particle (ecology); Particle counter; Condensation particle counter; Penetration (warfare); Particle number; Composite material; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Nanotechnology; Chemistry; Chromatography; Mathematics; Volume (thermodynamics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001420083,0.000100102,0.0002099993,0.00005447953,0.0000343485,0.00002514274,0.00008621917,0.0000350193,0.00004653099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001742515,0.00006541685,0.00006588615,0.00009379892,0.00002865395,0.0003475741,0.000004182522,0.00006175232,0.000003272839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004355392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002650499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002092863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986774,0.0001158183,0.0006596089,0.00003965845,0.0003465831,0.0001609477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990913,0.00006779467,0.0004114445,0.0001157477,0.0002681516,0.00004552284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009671247,0.00006822719,0.001071041,0.00003653849,0.00002998492,2.161845e-7,0.00052704,0.0009390928,0.9914361,0.0001161895,0.0002246286,0.005454285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002603189,0.0005318138,0.01489358,0.00009101264,0.00002467015,0.000006655413,0.00003725538,0.001164134,0.9828556,0.00004942022,0.00002162831,0.00006389872],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975328,0.00005334514,0.001903301,0.00006310476,0.0001668373,0.0001573184,0.000009444905,0.00002136893,0.00009248111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990856,0.00005830568,0.0006793401,0.00002582421,0.0001247768,0.000009326799,0.000001942315,0.00001319073,0.000001707233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01382254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2667622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03214291142290983,"score_gpt":0.2745410858421211,"score_spread":0.2423981744192112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}